next up previous contents
Next: 9.2 Stochastic perturbation Up: 9. Rigid magnetic moment Previous: 9. Rigid magnetic moment   Contents


9.1 Deterministic behaviour -
The Stoner-Wohlfarth model

A rigid magnetic moment is an approximation for a very small magnetic particle with strong exchange interaction. If it is small enough, the exchange interaction will keep the magnetization uniform which leads to coherent rotation. In this reversal mode the constituent spins rotate in unison. The exchange interaction gives a constant contribution to the Landau free energy in this approximation and therefore does not influence the motion of the magnetization vector. These are the common assumptions in the Stoner-Wohlfarth model.

The undamped equation of motion ([*]) describes the continuous precession of the magnetization vector around the direction of the effective magnetic field. However, changes of the magnetization are known from experiment to decay in finite time. Thus, damping is introduced by a phenomenological term. The commonly used Landau-Lifshitz equation of motion ([*]) results in a spiraling movement of the magnetization vector towards its equilibrium direction. The analytical solution [50]

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{M} = M_\mathrm{s}
\left(
\begin{array}{c}
\mathr...
...H t)\\
\mathrm{tanh}(\alpha \gamma H t)
\end{array} \right)
\end{displaymath}

is given as a projection into the $x-y$ plane in figure [*] for two different values of the damping parameter. If the damping parameter is rather low (fig. [*]) the magnetization vector precesses many times before it reaches its equilibrium direction. If $\alpha=1$ the precession is critically damped, and the magnetization turns ``directly'' into the direction of the effective field.

Figure: Trajectory of the magnetization vector
[$\alpha=0.1$] \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig/sim070207.eps} [$\alpha=1$] \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig/sim070209.eps}

Figure [*] shows, how the switching time depends on the value of the damping parameter. Initially, the magnetization vector points in a direction opposite to the effective field. A small deflection starts the reversal process. We can measure the switching time, which is the time, until the component of the magnetization parallel to the effective field has reached a certain value (e.g. $M_z=-0.9$). For $\alpha < 1$ the motion of the magnetization vector is undercritically damped. It makes many precessions around the direction of the effective field. On the contrary, for $\alpha > 1$ the motion is overcritically damped. The minimum of the switching time is found for $\alpha=1$, which is the case of critical damping [51]. Table [*] shows the damping parameters for magnetic materials [50,52], which are commonly used in magnetic recording tapes. These values are obtained by ferromagnetic resonance experiments: A very strong external DC field keeps the magnetization of the sample homogeneous and parallel to its direction. A small AC field perpendicular to the DC field excites a periodic motion of the magnetization with a small amplitude. As the frequency of the AC field is varied, the absorbed energy varies and at the resonance frequency it reaches a maximum. From the width of the absorption spectrum, the damping constant can be derived.

Figure: Dependence of switching time on damping constant
\includegraphics[scale=0.6]{fig/sim021602.eps}


Table: Damping parameters of particulate magnetic recording materials
material $\alpha$
CrO$_2$ 0.051
$\gamma$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ 0.066
Co-$\gamma$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ 0.13
MP (metal particle) 0.92


The equilibrium direction of the magnetic moment is determined by the magnetocrystalline anisotropy axis and the direction of the external field. It can be readily obtained by considering the Landau free energy $G_L$ of the magnetic moment, which is in the case of uniaxial anisotropy given by

\begin{displaymath}
G_L=- K_1 V \cos^2(\theta-\phi)-M_\mathrm{s} V H \cos\phi \quad.
\end{displaymath}

Figure: Definition of angles in the Stoner-Wohlfarth model
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{fig/stonwohl.eps}

$K_1$ is the first magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant, $V$ the volume of the magnetic particle, $M_\mathrm{s}$ its saturation magnetization, and $H$ the external field. If an external field is applied at an angle $\theta$ to the easy axis of the uniaxial anisotropy of the particle, the magnetization vector will reach its equilibrium position at an angle $\phi$ from the field direction, where the Landau free energy has a local minimum. Since there is not only one minimum the equilibrium direction is also influenced by the history of the magnetization vector. This effect is called hysteresis.

Figure: Hysteresis curves of a spherical single domain particle for different angles between anisotropy axis and external field [53]
\includegraphics[scale=0.6]{fig/sw_hyst.eps}

Another important aspect can be explained using this simple model: The difference between reversible and irreversible magnetization processes. Reversible processes are those, in which the magnetization returns to its initial position after the perturbation has been removed again. For example, when a weak external bias field is applied, the magnetization will change slightly, but upon removal of the bias field, it returns to its initial position. However, if the bias field is strong enough, the magnetization can switch irreversibly and remain in a different energy minimum after the bias field has been switched off. Of course, this effect is used to switch the magnetization between different directions and store information thereby.

The ``energy landscape'' for a cobalt sphere with $K_1=4.5\times 10^{5} \mathrm{~J/m^3}$, $M_\mathrm{s}=1.4\times 10^{6} \mathrm{~A/m}$ and a volume of $1000~\mathrm{nm^3}$ is given in figure [*]. An external field of $100~\mathrm{kA/m}$ is applied at an angle of $35^\circ$ to the easy axis. One energy minimum is found for $\phi=29.407^\circ$ and a second for $\phi=226.277^\circ$.

Figure: Energy landscape
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig/stonengy.eps}


next up previous contents
Next: 9.2 Stochastic perturbation Up: 9. Rigid magnetic moment Previous: 9. Rigid magnetic moment   Contents
Werner Scholz 2000-05-16