next up previous contents
Next: 3.3 Evaluation of the Up: 3. The finite difference Previous: 3.1 Discretization of the   Contents

3.2 Discretization of the demagnetizing field

Another difficulty arises from the calculation of the demagnetizing field. Within each computational cell, the Wigner-Seitz cell of the lattice point, the magnetization is assumed to be homogeneous. We could now try to discretize Poisson's equation ([*]) and Laplace's equation ([*]). The main difficulty arises from the open boundary conditions, which are discussed in section [*]. However, for a lattice of homogeneously magnetized cubes, it is possible to calculate the demagnetizing field analytically [23]. The expressions obtained are quite complex and computationally expensive to implement. Since the calculation of the demagnetization field by a magnetic scalar potential is very efficiently implemented in the finite element package, a third possibility has been chosen for the finite difference program. That is the approximation of the demagnetization field of each computational cell by the field of a magnetic dipole in the centre of the cell with the magnetic moment $\mathbf{m}_i = \mathbf{M}_i \Delta x^3$ [24,25].

\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{H}_\mathrm{dip}=-\frac{1}{4\pi}
\sum_{j \not = i} ...
...3\frac{\mathbf{R}_{ij}(\mathbf{M}_j\mathbf{R}_{ij})}{R_{ij}^5}
\end{displaymath}

The inaccuracy is not large and the true long-range nature of the problem is kept [26]. This is due to the fact, that the quadrupole moment of a uniformly magnetized cube is identically zero. Only the next term in a multipole expansion, the octapole term, would give an non-zero contribution [27]

The contributions by the external field and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy to the effective field are straightforward, and they are all summarized in chapter [*].


next up previous contents
Next: 3.3 Evaluation of the Up: 3. The finite difference Previous: 3.1 Discretization of the   Contents
Werner Scholz 2000-05-16